Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Extended limitation for sale of attached immovable property operates retrospectively as a procedural amendment only where the original limitation had not expired when the amendment took effect; it cannot revive already time-barred recovery claims. The seven-year period therefore applied to later assessment years whose unamended limitation remained alive, while sale proceedings for earlier time-barred years were barred. Tax Recovery Officer functions concerning attachment, sale proclamation and setting aside sales are quasi-judicial, allowing exclusion of the Supreme Court-prescribed COVID-19 limitation period and court-ordered stay periods. Where no appeal is filed, limitation under Rule 68B begins after expiry of the notice-of-demand period, when the assessment becomes final for recovery purposes.
Extended limitation for sale of attached immovable property operates retrospectively as a procedural amendment only where the original limitation had not expired when the amendment took effect; it cannot revive already time-barred recovery claims. The seven-year period therefore applied to later assessment years whose unamended limitation remained alive, while sale proceedings for earlier time-barred years were barred. Tax Recovery Officer functions concerning attachment, sale proclamation and setting aside sales are quasi-judicial, allowing exclusion of the Supreme Court-prescribed COVID-19 limitation period and court-ordered stay periods. Where no appeal is filed, limitation under Rule 68B begins after expiry of the notice-of-demand period, when the assessment becomes final for recovery purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.