Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For reassessment notices issued more than three years after the end of the relevant assessment year, prior approval from the higher specified authority under section 151(ii) is a jurisdictional precondition. Approval from the Principal Commissioner under section 151(i) is insufficient where section 151(ii) applies. Applying this requirement to assessment year 2018-19, the section 148 notice and reassessment under sections 147 and 144B were void ab initio because the required approval was not obtained. The appeal was allowed after condoning delay, and the reassessment was quashed.
For reassessment notices issued more than three years after the end of the relevant assessment year, prior approval from the higher specified authority under section 151(ii) is a jurisdictional precondition. Approval from the Principal Commissioner under section 151(i) is insufficient where section 151(ii) applies. Applying this requirement to assessment year 2018-19, the section 148 notice and reassessment under sections 147 and 144B were void ab initio because the required approval was not obtained. The appeal was allowed after condoning delay, and the reassessment was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.