Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
781 to 800 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Charitable purpose is not defeated where sponsorship receipts from a women's marathon have a real and proximate nexus with objects of women's health, fitness, awareness and empowerment. The proviso to section 2(15) requires proof that the recipient's activity intrinsically operates as trade, commerce or business; sponsors' advertising treatment, receipt magnitude or surplus alone is insufficient. The 20% receipts formulation did not apply for the relevant assessment year, and exceeding the applicable monetary threshold could not replace that proof. Consequently, section 13(8) could not deny exemption under sections 11 and 12. Form No. 10B furnished during assessment cured an erroneous original exemption form where audit was completed before return filing and eligibility was examined on merits; the lapse was procedural.
Charitable purpose is not defeated where sponsorship receipts from a women's marathon have a real and proximate nexus with objects of women's health, fitness, awareness and empowerment. The proviso to section 2(15) requires proof that the recipient's activity intrinsically operates as trade, commerce or business; sponsors' advertising treatment, receipt magnitude or surplus alone is insufficient. The 20% receipts formulation did not apply for the relevant assessment year, and exceeding the applicable monetary threshold could not replace that proof. Consequently, section 13(8) could not deny exemption under sections 11 and 12. Form No. 10B furnished during assessment cured an erroneous original exemption form where audit was completed before return filing and eligibility was examined on merits; the lapse was procedural.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.