Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
State-law registration required for educational approval under...
Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motive.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
State-law registration required for educational approval under section 10(23C)(vi) was satisfied once registration with the competent Devsthan authority had been obtained, so absence of registration could not support rejection. Compliance with mandatory State or local registration requirements remains necessary. Trustee ownership of land used for educational infrastructure, without evidence of siphoning, private appropriation, diversion of funds or pecuniary advantage, does not establish private benefit. Incidental surplus from educational activities also does not demonstrate a profit motive where retained and applied to educational infrastructure and facilities. Approval was directed because the institution operated solely for education and not for profit.
State-law registration required for educational approval under section 10(23C)(vi) was satisfied once registration with the competent Devsthan authority had been obtained, so absence of registration could not support rejection. Compliance with mandatory State or local registration requirements remains necessary. Trustee ownership of land used for educational infrastructure, without evidence of siphoning, private appropriation, diversion of funds or pecuniary advantage, does not establish private benefit. Incidental surplus from educational activities also does not demonstrate a profit motive where retained and applied to educational infrastructure and facilities. Approval was directed because the institution operated solely for education and not for profit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
