Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
State-law registration required for educational approval under...
Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motive.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
State-law registration required for educational approval under section 10(23C)(vi) was satisfied once registration with the competent Devsthan authority had been obtained, so absence of registration could not support rejection. Compliance with mandatory State or local registration requirements remains necessary. Trustee ownership of land used for educational infrastructure, without evidence of siphoning, private appropriation, diversion of funds or pecuniary advantage, does not establish private benefit. Incidental surplus from educational activities also does not demonstrate a profit motive where retained and applied to educational infrastructure and facilities. Approval was directed because the institution operated solely for education and not for profit.
State-law registration required for educational approval under section 10(23C)(vi) was satisfied once registration with the competent Devsthan authority had been obtained, so absence of registration could not support rejection. Compliance with mandatory State or local registration requirements remains necessary. Trustee ownership of land used for educational infrastructure, without evidence of siphoning, private appropriation, diversion of funds or pecuniary advantage, does not establish private benefit. Incidental surplus from educational activities also does not demonstrate a profit motive where retained and applied to educational infrastructure and facilities. Approval was directed because the institution operated solely for education and not for profit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
