Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Unauthorised lending of a Customs Broker licence and dongle to a...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breached.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Unauthorised lending of a Customs Broker licence and dongle to a G-card holder for consideration constitutes an impermissible transfer because the prohibition applies to the substance of the arrangement, not merely proprietary title. Filing a Shipping Bill in an exporter's name without that exporter's authority, while failing to verify the client's identity and functioning, independently breaches Customs Broker obligations; verification of IEC and GST particulars alone is insufficient, and knowledge of prohibited goods is unnecessary. No separate breach arose from information imparted to a client where no incorrect information was identified. Revocation, security forfeiture and penalty remained proportionate to the cumulative misconduct.
Unauthorised lending of a Customs Broker licence and dongle to a G-card holder for consideration constitutes an impermissible transfer because the prohibition applies to the substance of the arrangement, not merely proprietary title. Filing a Shipping Bill in an exporter's name without that exporter's authority, while failing to verify the client's identity and functioning, independently breaches Customs Broker obligations; verification of IEC and GST particulars alone is insufficient, and knowledge of prohibited goods is unnecessary. No separate breach arose from information imparted to a client where no incorrect information was identified. Revocation, security forfeiture and penalty remained proportionate to the cumulative misconduct.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
