Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Unauthorised lending of a Customs Broker licence and dongle to a...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breached.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Unauthorised lending of a Customs Broker licence and dongle to a G-card holder for consideration constitutes an impermissible transfer because the prohibition applies to the substance of the arrangement, not merely proprietary title. Filing a Shipping Bill in an exporter's name without that exporter's authority, while failing to verify the client's identity and functioning, independently breaches Customs Broker obligations; verification of IEC and GST particulars alone is insufficient, and knowledge of prohibited goods is unnecessary. No separate breach arose from information imparted to a client where no incorrect information was identified. Revocation, security forfeiture and penalty remained proportionate to the cumulative misconduct.
Unauthorised lending of a Customs Broker licence and dongle to a G-card holder for consideration constitutes an impermissible transfer because the prohibition applies to the substance of the arrangement, not merely proprietary title. Filing a Shipping Bill in an exporter's name without that exporter's authority, while failing to verify the client's identity and functioning, independently breaches Customs Broker obligations; verification of IEC and GST particulars alone is insufficient, and knowledge of prohibited goods is unnecessary. No separate breach arose from information imparted to a client where no incorrect information was identified. Revocation, security forfeiture and penalty remained proportionate to the cumulative misconduct.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
