Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Writ jurisdiction over regulatory ODR arbitration is confined to...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before the arbitral forum.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Writ jurisdiction over regulatory ODR arbitration is confined to cases of demonstrable lack of authority, breach of the governing framework, or a patent jurisdictional defect; allocation to an ODR institution empanelled by a particular stock exchange does not alone establish invalidity. Allocation depends on the participant's listing status, relevant exchanges, the grievance, and portal-based allocation. Mandatory participation after unsuccessful conciliation does not create jurisdiction where the framework excludes the dispute, nor does it waive sustainable objections. Limitation, locus, maintainability, prior proceedings, res judicata, abuse of process, arbitrability and substantive entitlement remain for the arbitral forum. The petition was dismissed, requiring participation and applicable fees without prejudice to objections.
Writ jurisdiction over regulatory ODR arbitration is confined to cases of demonstrable lack of authority, breach of the governing framework, or a patent jurisdictional defect; allocation to an ODR institution empanelled by a particular stock exchange does not alone establish invalidity. Allocation depends on the participant's listing status, relevant exchanges, the grievance, and portal-based allocation. Mandatory participation after unsuccessful conciliation does not create jurisdiction where the framework excludes the dispute, nor does it waive sustainable objections. Limitation, locus, maintainability, prior proceedings, res judicata, abuse of process, arbitrability and substantive entitlement remain for the arbitral forum. The petition was dismissed, requiring participation and applicable fees without prejudice to objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
