Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Rectification under section 154 cannot withdraw a deduction...
Rectification of debatable deduction claims cannot reverse scrutiny-approved co-operative society interest income deductions as apparent record errors.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Rectification under section 154 cannot withdraw a deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) that was expressly claimed and accepted after scrutiny where its eligibility involves a debatable statutory question. Interest income was claimed as business income attributable to a co-operative society's activities and allowed after verification under section 143(3). The subsequent view that the claim was inconsistent with decisions concerning section 80P(2)(d) required reconsideration of an already examined claim, rather than correction of a mistake apparent from the record. The rectification and appellate orders reversing the deduction were therefore set aside.
Rectification under section 154 cannot withdraw a deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) that was expressly claimed and accepted after scrutiny where its eligibility involves a debatable statutory question. Interest income was claimed as business income attributable to a co-operative society's activities and allowed after verification under section 143(3). The subsequent view that the claim was inconsistent with decisions concerning section 80P(2)(d) required reconsideration of an already examined claim, rather than correction of a mistake apparent from the record. The rectification and appellate orders reversing the deduction were therefore set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
