Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS credit transferred following amalgamation must be granted to the amalgamated entity where the related income is substantively assessed in its hands and the amalgamating entity has not claimed that credit. Section 199 read with Rule 37BA applies despite the TDS appearing under the amalgamating entity's PAN. Where the credit was claimed in the original and revised returns and subsequently allowed, refund interest under section 244A(1) is payable for the full applicable period. Delay cannot be excluded under section 244A(2) merely because the Assessing Officer wrongly attributes default to the taxpayer.
TDS credit transferred following amalgamation must be granted to the amalgamated entity where the related income is substantively assessed in its hands and the amalgamating entity has not claimed that credit. Section 199 read with Rule 37BA applies despite the TDS appearing under the amalgamating entity's PAN. Where the credit was claimed in the original and revised returns and subsequently allowed, refund interest under section 244A(1) is payable for the full applicable period. Delay cannot be excluded under section 244A(2) merely because the Assessing Officer wrongly attributes default to the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.