Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Limitation for an assessment giving effect to appellate...
Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered summons.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Limitation for an assessment giving effect to appellate directions runs from receipt or passing of the appellate order by the specified senior income-tax authorities, not from delivery to the Departmental Representative. Where no receipt date is recorded, internal transmission of a batch of orders does not establish earlier receipt, and the assessment may be treated as timely. Unexplained purchase expenditure cannot be added solely because suppliers did not answer summons when supplier existence, VAT verification, stock records, and corresponding sales support the transactions. The deletion of the purchase addition was sustained, while the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed.
Limitation for an assessment giving effect to appellate directions runs from receipt or passing of the appellate order by the specified senior income-tax authorities, not from delivery to the Departmental Representative. Where no receipt date is recorded, internal transmission of a batch of orders does not establish earlier receipt, and the assessment may be treated as timely. Unexplained purchase expenditure cannot be added solely because suppliers did not answer summons when supplier existence, VAT verification, stock records, and corresponding sales support the transactions. The deletion of the purchase addition was sustained, while the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
