Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Advertisement, marketing and promotion expenditure incurred for...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjustment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Advertisement, marketing and promotion expenditure incurred for an assessee's own business and market penetration does not constitute an international transaction merely because an associated enterprise receives an incidental benefit. An agreement or arrangement with the associated enterprise is required to establish such a transaction. The bright line test is not a recognised method for inferring an international transaction or making a transfer pricing adjustment. Applying earlier coordinate-bench decisions on materially identical facts, the AMP transfer pricing adjustment was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Advertisement, marketing and promotion expenditure incurred for an assessee's own business and market penetration does not constitute an international transaction merely because an associated enterprise receives an incidental benefit. An agreement or arrangement with the associated enterprise is required to establish such a transaction. The bright line test is not a recognised method for inferring an international transaction or making a transfer pricing adjustment. Applying earlier coordinate-bench decisions on materially identical facts, the AMP transfer pricing adjustment was deleted and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.