Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Real estate allottees seeking financial creditor status must establish a subsisting financial debt owed by the corporate debtor. Invoking arbitration for refund, accepting and presenting refund cheques, and pursuing remedies for dishonour constitute an election to seek refund rather than continue with allotment. Such conduct precludes simultaneous reliance on continuing allottee status and the deemed commercial effect of borrowing. The Supreme Court ruling concerning an existing allottee with a RERA decree was distinguished because the allottees had themselves pursued refund remedies. Recognition as financial creditors was therefore unavailable, and dismissal of the company appeals followed.
Real estate allottees seeking financial creditor status must establish a subsisting financial debt owed by the corporate debtor. Invoking arbitration for refund, accepting and presenting refund cheques, and pursuing remedies for dishonour constitute an election to seek refund rather than continue with allotment. Such conduct precludes simultaneous reliance on continuing allottee status and the deemed commercial effect of borrowing. The Supreme Court ruling concerning an existing allottee with a RERA decree was distinguished because the allottees had themselves pursued refund remedies. Recognition as financial creditors was therefore unavailable, and dismissal of the company appeals followed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.