Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Condonation of delay in the Revenue's income-tax appeal depends on whether sufficient cause is shown through a bona fide and adequately explained process, rather than on the length of delay alone. Departmental scrutiny, approvals, record collection and preparation of the appeal memorandum may constitute sufficient cause where the explanation is not specifically denied or shown to be non-existent. Handwritten dates in an otherwise standard-form delay application do not by themselves establish that the explanation is stereotyped or unreliable when the application materially accounts for the delay. On these facts, the departmental procedural delay was treated as bona fide, the delay was condoned, and the appeal was directed for admission processing.
Condonation of delay in the Revenue's income-tax appeal depends on whether sufficient cause is shown through a bona fide and adequately explained process, rather than on the length of delay alone. Departmental scrutiny, approvals, record collection and preparation of the appeal memorandum may constitute sufficient cause where the explanation is not specifically denied or shown to be non-existent. Handwritten dates in an otherwise standard-form delay application do not by themselves establish that the explanation is stereotyped or unreliable when the application materially accounts for the delay. On these facts, the departmental procedural delay was treated as bona fide, the delay was condoned, and the appeal was directed for admission processing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.