Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dividend distribution tax on dividends paid to a Netherlands-resident shareholder raises the question whether the lower India-Netherlands DTAA rate overrides the domestic rate under Section 115-O. Although High Court authority supported treaty-rate application, the issue was pending before the Supreme Court, which had advised High Courts to consider stays in matters involving the same controversy. Applying judicial discipline, the Tribunal declined to decide the treaty-rate claim pending Supreme Court adjudication. The appellate order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication in line with the Supreme Court's eventual decision.
Dividend distribution tax on dividends paid to a Netherlands-resident shareholder raises the question whether the lower India-Netherlands DTAA rate overrides the domestic rate under Section 115-O. Although High Court authority supported treaty-rate application, the issue was pending before the Supreme Court, which had advised High Courts to consider stays in matters involving the same controversy. Applying judicial discipline, the Tribunal declined to decide the treaty-rate claim pending Supreme Court adjudication. The appellate order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication in line with the Supreme Court's eventual decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.