Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Excess drawback paid under self-assessed export shipping bills cannot be recovered directly under Section 75A(2) merely because exported goods were subsequently found misclassified. A subsisting self-assessment remains the basis of payment until the proper officer reassesses it under Section 17(4), or follows the Section 18 procedure where applicable, to determine liability. Recovery proceedings initiated without prior reassessment, and consequential revisional and appellate orders, were set aside. Reassessment or other action under Sections 17 and 18 may be pursued where legally permissible.
Excess drawback paid under self-assessed export shipping bills cannot be recovered directly under Section 75A(2) merely because exported goods were subsequently found misclassified. A subsisting self-assessment remains the basis of payment until the proper officer reassesses it under Section 17(4), or follows the Section 18 procedure where applicable, to determine liability. Recovery proceedings initiated without prior reassessment, and consequential revisional and appellate orders, were set aside. Reassessment or other action under Sections 17 and 18 may be pursued where legally permissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.