Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Revision of an assessment is warranted where the Assessing Officer fails to apply the statutory deeming provisions to additions for undisclosed investment and unexplained cash, omits the applicable special tax rate, and does not consider penalty proceedings. An order is erroneous when based on incorrect facts or law, made without due application of mind, or contrary to natural justice. It is prejudicial to revenue where lawful tax is not realised. The revisional authority may set aside such an assessment, direct further inquiry, and require reassessment under the correct provisions after providing an opportunity of being heard.
Revision of an assessment is warranted where the Assessing Officer fails to apply the statutory deeming provisions to additions for undisclosed investment and unexplained cash, omits the applicable special tax rate, and does not consider penalty proceedings. An order is erroneous when based on incorrect facts or law, made without due application of mind, or contrary to natural justice. It is prejudicial to revenue where lawful tax is not realised. The revisional authority may set aside such an assessment, direct further inquiry, and require reassessment under the correct provisions after providing an opportunity of being heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.