Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Transactional Net Margin Method was treated as the most...
Transfer pricing method selection favours TNMM where medical-equipment distribution involves substantial post-import value addition and operational risk assumption.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transactional Net Margin Method was treated as the most appropriate method for benchmarking purchases by a medical-equipment distributor performing substantial post-import functions, including configuration, integration, installation, training, warranty and maintenance support. The Resale Price Method was considered unsuitable where resale involved significant value addition and risk assumption, and the transfer-pricing adjustment based on that method was deleted. Comparable companies require verification where related-party transactions may exceed the prescribed filter. Verification was also directed to prevent double taxation where a sundry balance written back had already been offered to tax and was again added during return processing. The appeal was partly allowed, with the remaining issues remanded for fresh determination.
Transactional Net Margin Method was treated as the most appropriate method for benchmarking purchases by a medical-equipment distributor performing substantial post-import functions, including configuration, integration, installation, training, warranty and maintenance support. The Resale Price Method was considered unsuitable where resale involved significant value addition and risk assumption, and the transfer-pricing adjustment based on that method was deleted. Comparable companies require verification where related-party transactions may exceed the prescribed filter. Verification was also directed to prevent double taxation where a sundry balance written back had already been offered to tax and was again added during return processing. The appeal was partly allowed, with the remaining issues remanded for fresh determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
