Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reassessment initiated beyond four years requires failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts relating to the recorded escapement of income. Explanation 3 to section 147 permits assessment of other escaped income discovered during valid reassessment proceedings, but does not expand the jurisdictional basis for reopening or sustain proceedings when no addition is made on either recorded ground. Where the recorded reasons yield no addition and the requisite failure of disclosure is not established, the reopening lacks jurisdiction. The reassessment was quashed, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Reassessment initiated beyond four years requires failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts relating to the recorded escapement of income. Explanation 3 to section 147 permits assessment of other escaped income discovered during valid reassessment proceedings, but does not expand the jurisdictional basis for reopening or sustain proceedings when no addition is made on either recorded ground. Where the recorded reasons yield no addition and the requisite failure of disclosure is not established, the reopening lacks jurisdiction. The reassessment was quashed, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.