Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Section 194N places the obligation to deduct tax at source on the banking company making a cash payment, not on the customer withdrawing cash. Failure to deduct attracts the statutory consequence under section 271C against the person responsible for deduction. A bank cannot impose a lien on a customer's current account for an alleged TDS liability without statutory authority or a direction from the income-tax authorities. The lien was directed to be released and account operations permitted after the customer furnished income-tax returns for the relevant three consecutive years, without limiting lawful action by tax authorities.
Section 194N places the obligation to deduct tax at source on the banking company making a cash payment, not on the customer withdrawing cash. Failure to deduct attracts the statutory consequence under section 271C against the person responsible for deduction. A bank cannot impose a lien on a customer's current account for an alleged TDS liability without statutory authority or a direction from the income-tax authorities. The lien was directed to be released and account operations permitted after the customer furnished income-tax returns for the relevant three consecutive years, without limiting lawful action by tax authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
