Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Third-party search assessments under section 153C require the seized material to be handed over to the other person's Assessing Officer before the statutory cut-off. Where handover occurs after 1 April 2021, section 153C is unavailable and proceedings may be pursued only under reassessment provisions; the resulting notice and assessment lack jurisdiction. Penalty for cash acceptance contrary to section 269SS, when unrelated to assessment, is subject to the limitation period beginning with the Assessing Officer's recommendation to initiate penalty proceedings. A penalty order issued after that period is time-barred and liable to be quashed.
Third-party search assessments under section 153C require the seized material to be handed over to the other person's Assessing Officer before the statutory cut-off. Where handover occurs after 1 April 2021, section 153C is unavailable and proceedings may be pursued only under reassessment provisions; the resulting notice and assessment lack jurisdiction. Penalty for cash acceptance contrary to section 269SS, when unrelated to assessment, is subject to the limitation period beginning with the Assessing Officer's recommendation to initiate penalty proceedings. A penalty order issued after that period is time-barred and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.