Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Transfer pricing on performance guarantees and overdue receivables deleted where warranty obligations were embedded and working capital adjustment alr...
    Natural justice requires disclosure of non-injurious price workings before final findings in anti-dumping proceedings.
    Transfer pricing comparability: exclusion of one comparable upheld, another included, and working capital adjustment directed.
    Customs classification and misdeclaration: tribunal upheld duty demand, confiscation, and penalties for deliberate false import description.
    Essential character test governs unfinished gold neck chains, leading to jewellery classification and setting aside confiscation and penalty.
    Rubber mixture classification and preferential exemption depend on essential character, origin rules, and import-time verification.
    Board explanation duty and limitation barred prosecution; cognizance failed for non-application of mind in issuing process.
    Crystallised provident fund dues required for CIRP claims; internal communications and tentative calculations are insufficient.
    Personal guarantor insolvency process: NCLAT upholds exclusion of time and rejects challenge based on lack of notice.
    Section 95 proceedings limited to the named guarantor; coparcenary claims did not justify intervention or stay.
    OTC INR derivative reporting expands to related parties globally, with phased coverage thresholds and two-day reporting timelines.
    SEZ to DTA clearances treated as imports for drawback on re-export of duty-paid goods under customs law.
    Approved resolution plan barred continued recovery action and compelled unblocking of input tax credit.
    Consideration of audit report in input tax credit dispute led to remand for fresh adjudication.
    Documentary evidence and cooperation justified anticipatory bail in a GST input tax credit investigation despite economic offence allegations.
    Writ jurisdiction for lack of officer competence under GST upheld; adjudication quashed for absence of proper authorisation.
    Retrospective input tax credit relief under Section 16(5) overrides Section 16(4), requiring fresh reconsideration of the claim.
    GST detention penalty requires a speaking order on the show cause notice; payment alone does not end adjudication.
    Provisional attachment under GST may be relaxed when substitute security protects revenue and business operations can resume.
    Input tax credit blocking based only on cancelled registration fails after restoration, with credit allowed to be used in law.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Unjust enrichment does not bar a customs-duty refund where...

Unjust enrichment in customs refunds fails where sales evidence proves duty incidence was not passed to buyers.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs August 18, 2026 Case Laws HC
Unjust enrichment does not bar a customs-duty refund where evidence establishes that the duty incidence was not passed to buyers. A Chartered Accountant certificate, Bills of Entry and sales invoices showing bunker oil was sold below its import value supported non-recovery of even the import cost. Once that material was produced, Revenue needed tangible evidence that buyers bore the duty; recording duty as expenditure in the profit and loss account was insufficient. The High Court upheld the finding that the importer had not passed on the duty incidence, so the refund was properly allowed and no substantial question of law arose.

Topics

Acts Income Tax