Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment jurisdiction was sustained because reasons to believe were recorded and the prescribed statutory procedure was followed. However, additions for alleged unexplained income and expenditure drawn from seized ledger entries could not be made again in another assessee's hands where the ledger owner had accepted the entire recorded amounts and those amounts had already been substantively assessed and confirmed in that person's hands. Corresponding protective additions in the company's hands also could not survive after the substantive additions in the individual's hands were deleted on merits. The challenges to reassessment failed, while the duplicate substantive and related protective additions were deleted.
Reassessment jurisdiction was sustained because reasons to believe were recorded and the prescribed statutory procedure was followed. However, additions for alleged unexplained income and expenditure drawn from seized ledger entries could not be made again in another assessee's hands where the ledger owner had accepted the entire recorded amounts and those amounts had already been substantively assessed and confirmed in that person's hands. Corresponding protective additions in the company's hands also could not survive after the substantive additions in the individual's hands were deleted on merits. The challenges to reassessment failed, while the duplicate substantive and related protective additions were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
