Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Revision under section 263 cannot rest merely on a view that the...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is established.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Revision under section 263 cannot rest merely on a view that the Assessing Officer should have conducted a deeper inquiry into share capital received from an existing non-resident shareholder. Where the assessment record shows detailed queries and supporting material on the investor's identity, creditworthiness, remittance and transaction, an assessment order need not expressly record every inquiry to establish application of mind. Revisionary jurisdiction does not permit re-examination where the Assessing Officer adopted a permissible view after inquiry. The revisionary authority must undertake at least minimal independent inquiry and clearly establish that the assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it cannot remand genuineness for fresh determination.
Revision under section 263 cannot rest merely on a view that the Assessing Officer should have conducted a deeper inquiry into share capital received from an existing non-resident shareholder. Where the assessment record shows detailed queries and supporting material on the investor's identity, creditworthiness, remittance and transaction, an assessment order need not expressly record every inquiry to establish application of mind. Revisionary jurisdiction does not permit re-examination where the Assessing Officer adopted a permissible view after inquiry. The revisionary authority must undertake at least minimal independent inquiry and clearly establish that the assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it cannot remand genuineness for fresh determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
