Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Revision under section 263 cannot rest merely on a view that the...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is established.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Revision under section 263 cannot rest merely on a view that the Assessing Officer should have conducted a deeper inquiry into share capital received from an existing non-resident shareholder. Where the assessment record shows detailed queries and supporting material on the investor's identity, creditworthiness, remittance and transaction, an assessment order need not expressly record every inquiry to establish application of mind. Revisionary jurisdiction does not permit re-examination where the Assessing Officer adopted a permissible view after inquiry. The revisionary authority must undertake at least minimal independent inquiry and clearly establish that the assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it cannot remand genuineness for fresh determination.
Revision under section 263 cannot rest merely on a view that the Assessing Officer should have conducted a deeper inquiry into share capital received from an existing non-resident shareholder. Where the assessment record shows detailed queries and supporting material on the investor's identity, creditworthiness, remittance and transaction, an assessment order need not expressly record every inquiry to establish application of mind. Revisionary jurisdiction does not permit re-examination where the Assessing Officer adopted a permissible view after inquiry. The revisionary authority must undertake at least minimal independent inquiry and clearly establish that the assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; it cannot remand genuineness for fresh determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
