Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Related-party advances by a charitable society did not warrant denial of exemption where the construction advance arose in ordinary construction activity and no evidence showed personal benefit to specified persons, overpricing, or non-arm's-length terms. Advances to registered charitable institutions were not shown to divert funds for private benefit. Section 40A(2)(a) could not apply because the disputed interest was paid to unrelated banks, making the related disallowance and notional-interest addition unsustainable. Donations to registered charitable entities undertaking charitable activities were permissible application of income, and scholarships were claimed as charitable application. The disallowances were deleted and exemption under sections 11 and 12 was extended.
Related-party advances by a charitable society did not warrant denial of exemption where the construction advance arose in ordinary construction activity and no evidence showed personal benefit to specified persons, overpricing, or non-arm's-length terms. Advances to registered charitable institutions were not shown to divert funds for private benefit. Section 40A(2)(a) could not apply because the disputed interest was paid to unrelated banks, making the related disallowance and notional-interest addition unsustainable. Donations to registered charitable entities undertaking charitable activities were permissible application of income, and scholarships were claimed as charitable application. The disallowances were deleted and exemption under sections 11 and 12 was extended.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
