Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretion.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate an unauthorised acceptance of resignation retrospectively, relating back to the initial acceptance. An employee who sought waiver of notice, accepted separation benefits and certification, and obtained new employment cannot subsequently challenge the completed resignation on a technical defect in initial acceptance. Under statutory service rules making resignation effective upon acceptance, communication of acceptance and the date of actual relieving do not postpone its legal effect. Although withdrawal before relieving may ordinarily be permitted, the competent authority may refuse it for recorded, communicated and rational reasons. Judicial review does not replace that discretion absent mala fides, perversity or illegality.
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate an unauthorised acceptance of resignation retrospectively, relating back to the initial acceptance. An employee who sought waiver of notice, accepted separation benefits and certification, and obtained new employment cannot subsequently challenge the completed resignation on a technical defect in initial acceptance. Under statutory service rules making resignation effective upon acceptance, communication of acceptance and the date of actual relieving do not postpone its legal effect. Although withdrawal before relieving may ordinarily be permitted, the competent authority may refuse it for recorded, communicated and rational reasons. Judicial review does not replace that discretion absent mala fides, perversity or illegality.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
