Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretion.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate an unauthorised acceptance of resignation retrospectively, relating back to the initial acceptance. An employee who sought waiver of notice, accepted separation benefits and certification, and obtained new employment cannot subsequently challenge the completed resignation on a technical defect in initial acceptance. Under statutory service rules making resignation effective upon acceptance, communication of acceptance and the date of actual relieving do not postpone its legal effect. Although withdrawal before relieving may ordinarily be permitted, the competent authority may refuse it for recorded, communicated and rational reasons. Judicial review does not replace that discretion absent mala fides, perversity or illegality.
Ratification by the competent appointing authority can validate an unauthorised acceptance of resignation retrospectively, relating back to the initial acceptance. An employee who sought waiver of notice, accepted separation benefits and certification, and obtained new employment cannot subsequently challenge the completed resignation on a technical defect in initial acceptance. Under statutory service rules making resignation effective upon acceptance, communication of acceptance and the date of actual relieving do not postpone its legal effect. Although withdrawal before relieving may ordinarily be permitted, the competent authority may refuse it for recorded, communicated and rational reasons. Judicial review does not replace that discretion absent mala fides, perversity or illegality.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
