Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transitional applicability of the appellate pre-deposit requirement depends on the law in force when adjudicatory proceedings commenced through issuance of the show-cause notice. Appeals against penalty orders arising from notices issued before substitution of the proviso to Section 107(6) of the CGST Act remain governed by the earlier pre-deposit provision. Petitioners must pursue the statutory appellate remedy, with physical filing accepted where electronic filing is unavailable because no individual registration or temporary identification exists. The merits, including whether penalty provisions apply to a person who is not taxable, remain open for determination in accordance with the Supreme Court's ultimate decision.
Transitional applicability of the appellate pre-deposit requirement depends on the law in force when adjudicatory proceedings commenced through issuance of the show-cause notice. Appeals against penalty orders arising from notices issued before substitution of the proviso to Section 107(6) of the CGST Act remain governed by the earlier pre-deposit provision. Petitioners must pursue the statutory appellate remedy, with physical filing accepted where electronic filing is unavailable because no individual registration or temporary identification exists. The merits, including whether penalty provisions apply to a person who is not taxable, remain open for determination in accordance with the Supreme Court's ultimate decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
