Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    RTI officer designation revised for customs administration, with updated CPIO allocations and unchanged appellate authorities.
    Solar inverter classification under GST: parts of solar power systems qualify for concessional tax, with intended use accepted.
    Tariff classification of polypropylene leno bags turns on textile character, and plastic sacks classification was upheld.
    Statutory remedy bars writ interference where GST search and stock discrepancy issues turn on disputed facts.
    Input tax credit notice quashed for non-consideration of taxpayer objections; fresh speaking order directed after reconsideration.
    Statutory appeal and audit-based proceedings bar writ relief absent proven denial of hearing or lack of jurisdiction.
    Efficacious statutory appeal under GST bars writ review; petitioner may still file appeal within the court-granted time.
    Natural justice in GST adjudication requires consideration of reply and personal hearing before adverse orders are passed.
    Common portal notice after GST registration cancellation was insufficient; physical service and hearing were required before adjudication could procee...
    Reasoned appellate orders are mandatory; remand is proper where the first appeal lacks independent adjudication.
    Transfer pricing comparables must match both functional similarity and scale of operations; turnover mismatch can exclude a company.
    Legal representative notice valid, but reassessment failed for lack of competent approval under extended limitation rules
    Rectification jurisdiction is limited to obvious record errors; debatable issues and merit re-litigation cannot be reopened.
    Third-party search material requires section 153C, and reassessment fails where the officer relies on borrowed satisfaction.
    Commercial exploitation of property supports business income treatment, and unsupported estimated expense disallowance cannot stand.
    Captive power valuation under section 80-IA and fixed-asset expense allocation upheld; Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
    Double disallowance and broken period interest relief, with treaty-rate dividend claim remanded for missing foundational facts.
    Limitation, third-party evidence and section 65B proof defeated additions based on disputed cash entries and electronic records.
    Inordinate delay and absence of bona fides barred condonation where the assessee offered no sufficient cause for filing the appeal late.
    Transfer pricing receivables, goodwill depreciation and section 80-IC deductions were upheld on core business principles.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Transfer-pricing comparability requires functional similarity...

Transfer-pricing comparability requires functional similarity and current-year segmental data, supporting exclusion of materially different packaging companies.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax August 14, 2026 Case Laws HC
Transfer-pricing comparability requires functional similarity and reliable current-year segmental data. Bilcare Ltd. was excluded because of diversified operations, unavailable segmental data, and its pharmaceutical packaging profile, which differed from paper-based aseptic packaging for food and drink products. Karur KCP Packaging Ltd. was excluded because it produced kraft paper and polypropylene bags principally for the cement industry, making its products materially dissimilar. Earlier-year segmental data could not support current-year inclusion where relevant data was unavailable. The Tribunal's fact-based comparability findings disclosed neither error nor perversity, so no substantial question of law arose and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed; the separate Revenue appeal issue remained open.

Topics

Acts Income Tax