Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Finality of unchallenged personal insolvency resolution orders prevents a personal guarantor from reopening findings at the consequential bankruptcy stage. Where the guarantor was validly proceeded against ex parte in the resolution process, Section 121 does not require fresh prior notice before a bankruptcy order, particularly where the closure application and bankruptcy petition were served. A limitation objection also fails where an earlier SARFAESI demand enforced security interests rather than invoked the guarantee, and the insolvency application was filed within three years of the subsequent Code demand. Separate proceedings against other guarantors remain independent, and new grounds not raised before the Adjudicating Authority cannot ordinarily be introduced in appeal.
Finality of unchallenged personal insolvency resolution orders prevents a personal guarantor from reopening findings at the consequential bankruptcy stage. Where the guarantor was validly proceeded against ex parte in the resolution process, Section 121 does not require fresh prior notice before a bankruptcy order, particularly where the closure application and bankruptcy petition were served. A limitation objection also fails where an earlier SARFAESI demand enforced security interests rather than invoked the guarantee, and the insolvency application was filed within three years of the subsequent Code demand. Separate proceedings against other guarantors remain independent, and new grounds not raised before the Adjudicating Authority cannot ordinarily be introduced in appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
