Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Finality of unchallenged personal insolvency resolution orders prevents a personal guarantor from reopening findings at the consequential bankruptcy stage. Where the guarantor was validly proceeded against ex parte in the resolution process, Section 121 does not require fresh prior notice before a bankruptcy order, particularly where the closure application and bankruptcy petition were served. A limitation objection also fails where an earlier SARFAESI demand enforced security interests rather than invoked the guarantee, and the insolvency application was filed within three years of the subsequent Code demand. Separate proceedings against other guarantors remain independent, and new grounds not raised before the Adjudicating Authority cannot ordinarily be introduced in appeal.
Finality of unchallenged personal insolvency resolution orders prevents a personal guarantor from reopening findings at the consequential bankruptcy stage. Where the guarantor was validly proceeded against ex parte in the resolution process, Section 121 does not require fresh prior notice before a bankruptcy order, particularly where the closure application and bankruptcy petition were served. A limitation objection also fails where an earlier SARFAESI demand enforced security interests rather than invoked the guarantee, and the insolvency application was filed within three years of the subsequent Code demand. Separate proceedings against other guarantors remain independent, and new grounds not raised before the Adjudicating Authority cannot ordinarily be introduced in appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
