Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Draft SOP requires NBFC Factors to use the specified SWIFT message text when remitting foreign-currency factoring proceeds to AD-I Banks, so those banks do not create Inward Remittance Messages (IRMs) for such receipts. Where Factors discount export bills and release INR funds, customers seeking IRMs must approach the Factors rather than AD-I Banks. Factoring agencies must correctly identify factoring-related transactions when remitting funds. Exporters will be able to view NBFC Factor-related IRMs on the DGFT portal and self-certify eBRCs by matching remittances with invoices or Shipping Bills. Stakeholder comments are invited within 30 days of publication.
Draft SOP requires NBFC Factors to use the specified SWIFT message text when remitting foreign-currency factoring proceeds to AD-I Banks, so those banks do not create Inward Remittance Messages (IRMs) for such receipts. Where Factors discount export bills and release INR funds, customers seeking IRMs must approach the Factors rather than AD-I Banks. Factoring agencies must correctly identify factoring-related transactions when remitting funds. Exporters will be able to view NBFC Factor-related IRMs on the DGFT portal and self-certify eBRCs by matching remittances with invoices or Shipping Bills. Stakeholder comments are invited within 30 days of publication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.