Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Writ jurisdiction against CGST Orders-in-Original is unavailable where the statutory appeal provides an efficacious and comprehensive remedy for reviewing facts, law, evidence and adjudicatory correctness. Objections concerning hearing, notice service, technical difficulties, evidentiary authentication, corroboration, cross-examination and voluntary payment require record-based factual assessment by the appellate authority. Neither patent lack of jurisdiction nor a manifest, common breach of natural justice was established to justify bypassing that remedy. Petitioners who had already invoked the statutory appeal could not simultaneously pursue writ relief over the same order without exceptional circumstances. The writ petitions were dismissed, with merits left open for appellate consideration, including any request to exclude time spent in writ proceedings according to law.
Writ jurisdiction against CGST Orders-in-Original is unavailable where the statutory appeal provides an efficacious and comprehensive remedy for reviewing facts, law, evidence and adjudicatory correctness. Objections concerning hearing, notice service, technical difficulties, evidentiary authentication, corroboration, cross-examination and voluntary payment require record-based factual assessment by the appellate authority. Neither patent lack of jurisdiction nor a manifest, common breach of natural justice was established to justify bypassing that remedy. Petitioners who had already invoked the statutory appeal could not simultaneously pursue writ relief over the same order without exceptional circumstances. The writ petitions were dismissed, with merits left open for appellate consideration, including any request to exclude time spent in writ proceedings according to law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
