Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Reassessment notices must be initiated through the faceless assessment framework rather than by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer where algorithm-based random allocation governs reassessment proceedings. A final assessment order issued under the faceless regime does not cure the initial jurisdictional defect. Where the final order is already challenged before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the jurisdictional objection should be raised and considered in that statutory appeal, applying the relevant High Court precedents. The assessment order need not be independently quashed in writ proceedings when the pending appeal can address the objection.
Reassessment notices must be initiated through the faceless assessment framework rather than by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer where algorithm-based random allocation governs reassessment proceedings. A final assessment order issued under the faceless regime does not cure the initial jurisdictional defect. Where the final order is already challenged before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), the jurisdictional objection should be raised and considered in that statutory appeal, applying the relevant High Court precedents. The assessment order need not be independently quashed in writ proceedings when the pending appeal can address the objection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
