Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty proceedings for underreporting are independent of assessment proceedings. Failure to initiate penalty proceedings under section 270A while completing a reassessment does not, by itself, make the assessment order erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue for revisional purposes. Revisional jurisdiction was therefore held unjustified where it rested solely on that omission, and the revisional order was quashed. A contrary Tribunal decision relied upon by the Revenue was distinguished. The assessee's appeal succeeded.
Penalty proceedings for underreporting are independent of assessment proceedings. Failure to initiate penalty proceedings under section 270A while completing a reassessment does not, by itself, make the assessment order erroneous or prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue for revisional purposes. Revisional jurisdiction was therefore held unjustified where it rested solely on that omission, and the revisional order was quashed. A contrary Tribunal decision relied upon by the Revenue was distinguished. The assessee's appeal succeeded.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.