Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Material seized from a company director who managed its day-to-day affairs and was searched simultaneously could be used for the company's assessment under section 153A; separate proceedings under section 153C were unnecessary. The Tribunal found the consolidated section 153D approval for four assessment years mechanical because it showed no year-wise application of mind, quashing the assessments. For unabated years, the consistently accepted Project Completion Method could not be replaced by the Percentage Completion Method without relevant seized material, rejection of accounts under section 145(3), or a cogent factual basis; the resulting additions were deleted. Additions for both receipts and payments reflected in the same seized papers were also deleted as double taxation of income already offered and accepted.
Material seized from a company director who managed its day-to-day affairs and was searched simultaneously could be used for the company's assessment under section 153A; separate proceedings under section 153C were unnecessary. The Tribunal found the consolidated section 153D approval for four assessment years mechanical because it showed no year-wise application of mind, quashing the assessments. For unabated years, the consistently accepted Project Completion Method could not be replaced by the Percentage Completion Method without relevant seized material, rejection of accounts under section 145(3), or a cogent factual basis; the resulting additions were deleted. Additions for both receipts and payments reflected in the same seized papers were also deleted as double taxation of income already offered and accepted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
