Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Limitation for operational-debt insolvency applications runs from the individual date of default for each due and payable invoice or payment claim, not from continuing non-payment or subsistence of an EPC contract. A written acknowledgment by the corporate debtor before limitation expires is required to reset limitation; unilateral legal notices do not do so. Completed contractual milestones may constitute operational debt, while suspension, idling and demobilisation claims are uncrystallised damages unless adjudicated. Prolonged suspension does not automatically frustrate or terminate an EPC contract where termination requires election and time is not essential. A genuine pre-existing dispute must be evident from prior conduct or communications. The time-barred insolvency application was set aside, without affecting contractual dispute-resolution remedies.
Limitation for operational-debt insolvency applications runs from the individual date of default for each due and payable invoice or payment claim, not from continuing non-payment or subsistence of an EPC contract. A written acknowledgment by the corporate debtor before limitation expires is required to reset limitation; unilateral legal notices do not do so. Completed contractual milestones may constitute operational debt, while suspension, idling and demobilisation claims are uncrystallised damages unless adjudicated. Prolonged suspension does not automatically frustrate or terminate an EPC contract where termination requires election and time is not essential. A genuine pre-existing dispute must be evident from prior conduct or communications. The time-barred insolvency application was set aside, without affecting contractual dispute-resolution remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.