Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CENVAT credit attributable exclusively to trading is...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolution.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
CENVAT credit attributable exclusively to trading is inadmissible because trading is not an eligible output activity. Common input-service credit used for trading and taxable output services requires reasonable reversal, with the rule 6(3D)(c) formula proposed for quantification even before trading was expressly included as an exempted service. Proportionate credit on rented premises remains available where evidence establishes use for taxable services; a landlord's service-tax default does not by itself defeat that credit. Short-payment demands based on discrepancies between service-tax and income-tax returns require proof of deliberate intent to evade for extended limitation. Conflicting views remain on whether trading-related credit permits invocation of the extended period and consequential penalties, requiring Third Member determination.
CENVAT credit attributable exclusively to trading is inadmissible because trading is not an eligible output activity. Common input-service credit used for trading and taxable output services requires reasonable reversal, with the rule 6(3D)(c) formula proposed for quantification even before trading was expressly included as an exempted service. Proportionate credit on rented premises remains available where evidence establishes use for taxable services; a landlord's service-tax default does not by itself defeat that credit. Short-payment demands based on discrepancies between service-tax and income-tax returns require proof of deliberate intent to evade for extended limitation. Conflicting views remain on whether trading-related credit permits invocation of the extended period and consequential penalties, requiring Third Member determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
