Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Discrepancies between export turnover reported in Forms GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 require a registered taxable person to receive an opportunity to produce documents establishing the nature of the transactions and substantiating export turnover. Where non-participation in GST adjudication is explained and applicable Board Circulars contemplate such documentary verification, an ex parte determination may require fresh consideration. The appellate rejection based on inability to condone delay beyond 120 days and the adjudication order were quashed, with the proceedings restored for reconsideration after production of supporting documents and issuance of a reasoned order.
Discrepancies between export turnover reported in Forms GSTR-3B and GSTR-1 require a registered taxable person to receive an opportunity to produce documents establishing the nature of the transactions and substantiating export turnover. Where non-participation in GST adjudication is explained and applicable Board Circulars contemplate such documentary verification, an ex parte determination may require fresh consideration. The appellate rejection based on inability to condone delay beyond 120 days and the adjudication order were quashed, with the proceedings restored for reconsideration after production of supporting documents and issuance of a reasoned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
