Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The eighteen-month period for an Interim Board to dispose of a pending settlement application runs from its first allotment to, and action by, an Interim Board. An administrative transfer to another Interim Board does not restart or extend that limitation, because repeated transfers would undermine the statutory time-bound settlement framework. Exercise of the power to call for a report indicates that the application had already been allotted to and was within the first Interim Board's jurisdiction. The limitation period is mandatory; settlement and consequential rectification orders made after its expiry are time-barred and void. Questions concerning abatement and its consequences remain open.
The eighteen-month period for an Interim Board to dispose of a pending settlement application runs from its first allotment to, and action by, an Interim Board. An administrative transfer to another Interim Board does not restart or extend that limitation, because repeated transfers would undermine the statutory time-bound settlement framework. Exercise of the power to call for a report indicates that the application had already been allotted to and was within the first Interim Board's jurisdiction. The limitation period is mandatory; settlement and consequential rectification orders made after its expiry are time-barred and void. Questions concerning abatement and its consequences remain open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
