Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Internal CUP was treated as the most appropriate method for determining the arm's length price of project-office transactions under a turnkey power-project contract. Where the Indian project office bore the contract's risks and rewards, all revenue was attributed to India, and the unrelated customer regarded the head office and project office as one entity, the contract with that customer satisfied the comparability requirements for an internal CUP. CUP was preferred over TNMM as a more direct and suitable method, while the proposed TNMM comparables were rejected. The transfer-pricing adjustment was consequently not sustained, and the appeals were dismissed for lack of a substantial question of law.
Internal CUP was treated as the most appropriate method for determining the arm's length price of project-office transactions under a turnkey power-project contract. Where the Indian project office bore the contract's risks and rewards, all revenue was attributed to India, and the unrelated customer regarded the head office and project office as one entity, the contract with that customer satisfied the comparability requirements for an internal CUP. CUP was preferred over TNMM as a more direct and suitable method, while the proposed TNMM comparables were rejected. The transfer-pricing adjustment was consequently not sustained, and the appeals were dismissed for lack of a substantial question of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
