Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Section 264 provides beneficial and remedial revisional relief against over-assessment, including errors in a taxpayer's return. Relief is not dependent on filing a revised return within the prescribed time or on whether the error arose from the taxpayer's voluntary action or a departmental order. Taxing the same income in two assessment years can create an over-assessment where the combined effect of the relevant orders results in double taxation. A revisional authority must examine the claim and reconciliations on their merits rather than reject relief solely because an intimation accepted the returned income in isolation.
Section 264 provides beneficial and remedial revisional relief against over-assessment, including errors in a taxpayer's return. Relief is not dependent on filing a revised return within the prescribed time or on whether the error arose from the taxpayer's voluntary action or a departmental order. Taxing the same income in two assessment years can create an over-assessment where the combined effect of the relevant orders results in double taxation. A revisional authority must examine the claim and reconciliations on their merits rather than reject relief solely because an intimation accepted the returned income in isolation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.