Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS cannot survive where the underlying assessment is quashed and the satisfaction recorded in that assessment is obliterated. The principle applied to section 271E in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City extends to section 271D because the provisions are pari materia. Further, where the Assessing Officer records satisfaction to initiate penalty in the assessment order, limitation under section 275(1)(c) runs from that initiation, not from a later notice or initiation by the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner. The penalty was therefore unsustainable on both merits and limitation.
Penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS cannot survive where the underlying assessment is quashed and the satisfaction recorded in that assessment is obliterated. The principle applied to section 271E in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City extends to section 271D because the provisions are pari materia. Further, where the Assessing Officer records satisfaction to initiate penalty in the assessment order, limitation under section 275(1)(c) runs from that initiation, not from a later notice or initiation by the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner. The penalty was therefore unsustainable on both merits and limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.