Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS cannot survive where the underlying assessment is quashed and the satisfaction recorded in that assessment is obliterated. The principle applied to section 271E in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City extends to section 271D because the provisions are pari materia. Further, where the Assessing Officer records satisfaction to initiate penalty in the assessment order, limitation under section 275(1)(c) runs from that initiation, not from a later notice or initiation by the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner. The penalty was therefore unsustainable on both merits and limitation.
Penalty under section 271D for contravention of section 269SS cannot survive where the underlying assessment is quashed and the satisfaction recorded in that assessment is obliterated. The principle applied to section 271E in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills Ambala City extends to section 271D because the provisions are pari materia. Further, where the Assessing Officer records satisfaction to initiate penalty in the assessment order, limitation under section 275(1)(c) runs from that initiation, not from a later notice or initiation by the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner. The penalty was therefore unsustainable on both merits and limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.