Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Omission of the specified domestic transaction provision for related-party expenditure, without a saving clause for pending actions, treats the omitted provision as if it had never existed. Consequently, transfer-pricing cognizance taken under that omitted provision, the reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, and consequential transfer-pricing proceedings lack validity. Applying this settled position, the Tribunal allowed the taxpayer's grounds and did not sustain the assessment founded on the impugned transfer-pricing reference.
Omission of the specified domestic transaction provision for related-party expenditure, without a saving clause for pending actions, treats the omitted provision as if it had never existed. Consequently, transfer-pricing cognizance taken under that omitted provision, the reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer, and consequential transfer-pricing proceedings lack validity. Applying this settled position, the Tribunal allowed the taxpayer's grounds and did not sustain the assessment founded on the impugned transfer-pricing reference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
