Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Regulation 11(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguards.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Regulation 11(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 permits exceptional preventive suspension of Customs Cargo Service Provider approval only where an independently recorded, explicit satisfaction establishes an immediate and continuing threat to revenue or customs-area security. Allegations supporting regular proceedings or a pending DRI investigation do not replace the Regulation 12 inquiry. Continued suspension without verification of deficiencies, fresh evidence of a subsisting threat, prompt inquiry, or reasonable departmental action may become punitive and disproportionate. Restoration may be made subject to revenue-protection conditions and continued corrective measures, without preventing regular action under Regulation 11(1) following a proper inquiry.
Regulation 11(2) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 permits exceptional preventive suspension of Customs Cargo Service Provider approval only where an independently recorded, explicit satisfaction establishes an immediate and continuing threat to revenue or customs-area security. Allegations supporting regular proceedings or a pending DRI investigation do not replace the Regulation 12 inquiry. Continued suspension without verification of deficiencies, fresh evidence of a subsisting threat, prompt inquiry, or reasonable departmental action may become punitive and disproportionate. Restoration may be made subject to revenue-protection conditions and continued corrective measures, without preventing regular action under Regulation 11(1) following a proper inquiry.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.