Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
GST on actionable claims arising from online gaming and betting, including the retrospective valuation framework for online gaming and casino transactions, stood governed by Supreme Court findings that had already addressed every substantive challenge and prayer raised. No issue remained for independent consideration. The writ petition was dismissed in terms of that judgment and the interim order was vacated. Petitioners could submit replies to the show cause notice within the stipulated period, with the competent authority required to adjudicate in accordance with law and the Supreme Court findings.
GST on actionable claims arising from online gaming and betting, including the retrospective valuation framework for online gaming and casino transactions, stood governed by Supreme Court findings that had already addressed every substantive challenge and prayer raised. No issue remained for independent consideration. The writ petition was dismissed in terms of that judgment and the interim order was vacated. Petitioners could submit replies to the show cause notice within the stipulated period, with the competent authority required to adjudicate in accordance with law and the Supreme Court findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.