Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Remittances received by an NRE account holder from non-resident relatives through banking channels, where NRE status and compliance with RBI guidelines are undisputed, were treated as exempt income not includible in total income. Funds credited to NRE accounts were regarded as beyond tax authorities' reach regarding their foreign source. Applying prior High Court rulings, the Tribunal's deletion of additions for unexplained investment and unexplained cash credits under sections 69 and 68 was sustained, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected because no substantial question of law arose.
Remittances received by an NRE account holder from non-resident relatives through banking channels, where NRE status and compliance with RBI guidelines are undisputed, were treated as exempt income not includible in total income. Funds credited to NRE accounts were regarded as beyond tax authorities' reach regarding their foreign source. Applying prior High Court rulings, the Tribunal's deletion of additions for unexplained investment and unexplained cash credits under sections 69 and 68 was sustained, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected because no substantial question of law arose.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.