Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Leave encashment received on retirement by non-government employees under section 10(10AA)(ii) is discussed in relation to a subsequently enhanced exemption ceiling. The enhancement is characterised as a remedial and beneficial measure that rationalises an existing exemption, reduces disparity with government employees, and mitigates hardship. On that approach, the enhanced ceiling is treated as enlarging an existing benefit rather than creating a new exemption, supporting liberal application to pending claims despite no express retrospective provision. Restricting claims to the earlier ceiling could differentiate between similarly placed employees solely by retirement timing.
Leave encashment received on retirement by non-government employees under section 10(10AA)(ii) is discussed in relation to a subsequently enhanced exemption ceiling. The enhancement is characterised as a remedial and beneficial measure that rationalises an existing exemption, reduces disparity with government employees, and mitigates hardship. On that approach, the enhanced ceiling is treated as enlarging an existing benefit rather than creating a new exemption, supporting liberal application to pending claims despite no express retrospective provision. Restricting claims to the earlier ceiling could differentiate between similarly placed employees solely by retirement timing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
